Questions regarding Thought Transference
Posted on Nov 14th, 2007
by 
Bryan
Bryan
Excluding energy channeled from healing spirit guides or special healing essences (nature elementals, crystals, magnets, colors, etc.) is there a difference between the healing virtue of human-derived magnetic energy created under the circumstances described below?
(a). magnetic energy created from the transference of specific thought with healing intent
(b). magnetic energy created from the transference of non-specific thought with healing intent
The answer suggests why healing energy transfer has varied effects on different people. The client may respond better to one or the other (exclusively). At a different point in healing, the client may respond best to both (mutually). This depends on the client's need at the time. The healing virtue of magnetic energy is always determined by the source or conduit. However, the effectiveness of the magnetic energy is always determined by the client. It is therefore, the healing facilitator's responsibility to determine what the client's needs are. When specific thought-forms are needed, the practitioner determines the extent in realization necessary and may induce actualization in terms of what the client should address on either or both the conscious (cognitive) and subconscious (cellular) levels.
Regarding metaphysical healing measures, why is there a variance in response per client?
The answer suggests that the client may perceive her own ideal expression of health or recovery the same way one perceives her ideal self-image. These aspects may be unique to a client's mentality and subsequent thought atmosphere. The answer suggests that the healing practitioner must be familiar or in-tune with the client's thought atmosphere, in order for positive thought transference to be effective. It behooves the practitioner to create adjustments in both his and his client's thought fields for harmony's sake, before the metaphysical/healing-telepathic interaction begins.
How do methods of healing from a traditional and non-traditional standpoint vary? Can the variance in both be counter-productive?
The answers discuss what a traditional healing discipline offers as its protocol, and when healing telepathy is an appropriately effective complement to that protocol. Not only do some traditional healing protocols conflict philosophically with its non-traditionally therapeutic counterpart, but both may occasionally conteract each other's process in physical terms. This scenario beckons holistic practitioners to meet the ultimate challenge. Be sure that the holistic measure is a complementary healing strategy, instead of being viewed and utilized as an alternative healing strategy.
Whichever the case, from a metaphysical standpoint, the healing outcome will be achieved when there is enlightenment through information. The healing practitioner contributes to this outcome by encouraging the client's mind-soul-body integration of this information. Be sure to expect extraordinary results, when both client and healing facilatator co-create this experience from the universal mind perspective.
(a). magnetic energy created from the transference of specific thought with healing intent
(b). magnetic energy created from the transference of non-specific thought with healing intent
The answer suggests why healing energy transfer has varied effects on different people. The client may respond better to one or the other (exclusively). At a different point in healing, the client may respond best to both (mutually). This depends on the client's need at the time. The healing virtue of magnetic energy is always determined by the source or conduit. However, the effectiveness of the magnetic energy is always determined by the client. It is therefore, the healing facilitator's responsibility to determine what the client's needs are. When specific thought-forms are needed, the practitioner determines the extent in realization necessary and may induce actualization in terms of what the client should address on either or both the conscious (cognitive) and subconscious (cellular) levels.
Regarding metaphysical healing measures, why is there a variance in response per client?
The answer suggests that the client may perceive her own ideal expression of health or recovery the same way one perceives her ideal self-image. These aspects may be unique to a client's mentality and subsequent thought atmosphere. The answer suggests that the healing practitioner must be familiar or in-tune with the client's thought atmosphere, in order for positive thought transference to be effective. It behooves the practitioner to create adjustments in both his and his client's thought fields for harmony's sake, before the metaphysical/healing-telepathic interaction begins.
How do methods of healing from a traditional and non-traditional standpoint vary? Can the variance in both be counter-productive?
The answers discuss what a traditional healing discipline offers as its protocol, and when healing telepathy is an appropriately effective complement to that protocol. Not only do some traditional healing protocols conflict philosophically with its non-traditionally therapeutic counterpart, but both may occasionally conteract each other's process in physical terms. This scenario beckons holistic practitioners to meet the ultimate challenge. Be sure that the holistic measure is a complementary healing strategy, instead of being viewed and utilized as an alternative healing strategy.
Whichever the case, from a metaphysical standpoint, the healing outcome will be achieved when there is enlightenment through information. The healing practitioner contributes to this outcome by encouraging the client's mind-soul-body integration of this information. Be sure to expect extraordinary results, when both client and healing facilatator co-create this experience from the universal mind perspective.
Access: Public
akashic creation
June 2008